by Harpreet Bhagrath | Oct 10, 2011 | Dealing with Writers/Columnists, Sample Communications
The following post tries to clarify doubts of freelance writers working with Cosmos Media, explaining all the vital components of our articles to them.
Headings
First, we write article headings in title case rather than in sentence case.
Second, we expect witty and sharp titles from our writers, so that the readers feel compelled to click on our features and articles. Here’s a site that carries catchy titles: http://www.mgid.com/. From this source, you can pick ideas on the kind of headlines and feature titles we are looking for. Of course, we cannot hype the gist of the article or feature, but we can still capture the Wow! factor in most informal features and some (not all) formal features.
Blurb
With blurb, we tell readers what they can expect to read. In the blurb, we don’t beat about the bushes and come straight to the point directly after the heading. Here are a few ways to write a blurb:
– Just try to summarise in roughly 15-25 words what you have written in the whole article
– Or, instead of summarising, you can also mention something interesting from within the feature and leave it for the readers to guess what the focus of the feature is going to be
– Another way to write a blurb would be to try and sell your article to the readers in 15-25 words; just think how you can do that
– To get a practical idea, go through the blurbs on the features published on our sites
Lead
This is the first paragraph — or, in some cases, first few paragraphs of the feature — that makes the angle or the focus of the feature known to the readers. It comes directly after the blurb and is the device feature writers use to attract the attention of the reader.
– Usually just one or two graphs long
– Different ways it can be written:
- You can make the reader curious; explain what’s in store for him; ask a question or questions; make an unusual statement; provide surprising or alarming statistics; write a quotation, adage or proverb; or state an unusual opinion
Sub-Headings
You have to provide sub-headings within the body of the feature; we do not accept a feature without them.
– Make sub-headings bold this way: <strong>Text to be made bold</strong>
Within the body of the feature, we try to write at least 30 words under a sub-heading. This is to give the feature more body as well as for the sub-headed part to justify having a sub-heading.
– Sub-headings having hardly any matter in them or those having just a one liner are not acceptable (like the one below).
- <strong>7. Take a Small Nap</strong> Studies reveal that a small nap during the day helps our mind and body recover from energy loss.
Box
The information in the box is not really central to the feature but is still germane to the topic, in that it throws a sidelight on the issue, or provides something extra to the readers that they will appreciate. To get ideas for the box material, kindly go through published features on our sites.
Authenticating Arguments and Ideas
Statements in any publication have to be backed by research, data, facts, and further information to acquire credibility. We would require you to not only cross-check facts and figures (that they are authentic and are coming from reputed sources) you may furnish in the article, but also make sure that every premise and argument you bring up is backed by logical reasoning and ample knowledge to expand on the argument.
Condensed Information
Contain all the researched information within 300-400 words. We need condensed information rather than verbose prose. So from your researched material, choose the most enlightening information bits, the most informative nuggets, if you will, the kind that spark an epiphany in the reader. You can discard the less informative stuff, as we are trying to provide the maximum value to the readers in a ‘tablet article’, so to speak.
Also, to further cut down the number of words, check verbiage, repetition, or wordiness in your writing style.
Portals’ Target Audiences
Also, kindly keep in mind that we write for the U.S. audience (in case of The Journeyer), and whatever research you do and whatever facts you choose to mention in the article are supposed to be relevant to the U.S. audience predominantly. For Brisvaani, the target audience is Indians living in Australia. Check with your assigned portal’s editor on the target audience, if you are not sure.
Formatting
You need to format the write-up this way: single line spacing between paragraphs, first word aligned left like the rest of the para, font style ‘Times New Roman’, and font size 12.
Any questions on the above? Just get in touch with the core team — shoot us a mail, message us on Yahoo Messenger, or just give us a tinkle.
Happy writing,
Cosmos Writers Editorial Team
by Harpreet Bhagrath | Aug 8, 2010 | Dealing with Writers/Columnists, Sample Communications
Dear (columnist’s name),
Thanks for sending the article. It was a good read.
But before we can publish it, we need you to format it our way.
Here’s a sample article on our portal: (Link to your sample article)
You will notice that we have given a blurb (text in bold directly after the heading), sub-headings, and a caption. In your forthcoming articles, is it possible for you, or your writers, to provide these three vital components of our articles?
Plus, we use title case in headings and sub-headings.
Kindly encase the sub-headings with html tags to make them bold, like this: <strong>sub-heading</strong>
For you to understand the components of our articles, we have attached a little tutorial.
Our policy is to carry the outgoing link at the end of the article, like you have given in the brief on you. But in that brief, we need you to link out using proper html code. Like this: <a href=”URL”>link text</a>
Waiting on your reply to publish the article.
Regards,
Cosmos Writers Editorial Team
***
Another sample below:
Dear Stewart,
Can you send a 400-words article on “Top 5 Tax Mistakes Americans Make”?
We shall be happy to review—and publish—it for our portal, if you offer it exclusively for The Journeyer.
Our target audiences are lay U.S. people who don’t understand the intricacies, technical terms, and jargon of the taxation world. Just keep that in mind and you can’t go wrong.
Here’s a sample article on our portal:
(Link to your sample article)
You will notice that we have given a blurb (text in bold directly after the heading), sub-headings, and a caption. In your forthcoming articles, is it possible for you, or your writers, to provide these three vital components of our articles?
Plus, we use title case in headings and sub-headings.
Kindly encase the sub-headings with html tags to make them bold, like this: <strong>sub-heading</strong>
For you to understand the components of our articles, we have attached a little tutorial.
Link back to your site, or inclusion of your Web site’s URL, is quite possible, long as the article is unique and original. Also, we carry the outgoing link at the end of the article, in the brief on the writer; we don’t, as a matter of policy, provide outgoing link in the beginning of the article.
If you like to regularly contribute such articles, we can discuss a few subjects for you to work on. In the beginning, you can send the write-ups in our email, but as we consistently receive interesting articles from you for a fortnight or so, we will create a contributor’s account for you.
Regards,
Cosmos Writers Editorial Team
by Harpreet Bhagrath | Oct 14, 2009 | Sample Communications
When you are an editor, you are not averse to grammatical mistakes once in a blue moon. No one is.
You are not supposed to know every word in the dictionary, and you cannot be expected to be the ever-ready grammar book. But you are supposed to know two things: how to find the unknown information quickly through your resources and how to accept your mistake.
Even the best editors and writers make mistakes. Making a mistake is not a mistake. Not accepting your mistake is. To me, humbleness and fussiness are two of the required qualities in an editor. You should be fussy enough to find faults with copies that are ready to be put to bed and humble enough to admit you faltered, if you did.
I had the pleasure to discuss one fine point with a humble editor once. A reputed literary firm in England was organising a short story competition in 2008, and I was thinking of submitting one of my short stories. But I was appalled to spot a grammatical mistake in one of their web pages. The following is what happened between me and the editor of that literary firm. They have corrected the mistake since then, so you’ll not be able to Google-find the exact phrase now.
My email to them in 2008
Hi there,
The following web page from your website contains a grammatical mistake that I just can’t overlook, being a stickler for correct English usage.
“With the wealth of variety in both style and content, no two writer handles the same subject in the same light, bringing to the table talent and imagination that is both moving and thought provoking.”
The error in question is in the bold words. It should be ‘no two writers handle….’ Kindly correct that.
I like to submit my short story in your short story competition, but before that I wish to see the correction materialise.
If I had seen this mistake anywhere else, I could’ve overlooked. But not on your website; you deal with English language. You have to keep it straight. It gives a very bad impression when a leading literary website is making grammatical goof-ups, displacing the fundamentals of English language. You even offer subediting and proofreading services!
Any potential customer for your proofreading services will have second thoughts after reading the erroneous sentence. He’d be better off going to your competitors.
You owe me a big thanks for bringing it to your notice. You can look forward to an increase in business after you correct the said mistake. Trust me.
Thanks and regards,
Harpreet Bhagrath
The reply to my email the next day
Dear Harpreet,
Thank you for getting in contact and for pointing out the grammatical error on our Novel Competition contents page.
In fact, I clearly remember deliberating over that sentence and although the correct reference looked right on paper, to my ear it sounded weak, however, I failed to lean on the side of logic. My sincere apologies. In hindsight I should have referred to my team.
Please be assured that our proofreaders are highly trained individuals and continue to provide a thorough and detailed service. I have since created a system whereby before any work is uploaded onto the website it is thoroughly checked by my team as a back up for potential mishaps.
If you have any other thoughts or questions please do not hesitate to get in touch again.
Yours sincerely,
Xxxxx Xxxxx